Diddy vs. R. Kelly: How similar are the cases for RICO charges?

  • Diddy's ex-assistant alleged he sexually assaulted her
  • One of Combs' charges is racketeering conspiracy
  • R. Kelly was sentenced to 30 years on racketeering, other charges

NOW PLAYING

Want to see more of NewsNation? Get 24/7 fact-based news coverage with the NewsNation app or add NewsNation as a preferred source on Google!

Editor’s Note: This story contains discussions of rape or sexual assault that may be disturbing. Reader discretion is advised. If you or someone you know has been sexually assaulted, you can find help and discreet resources on the National Sexual Assault Hotline website or by calling 1-800-656-4673.

(NewsNation) — One of Sean “Diddy” Combs’ former assistants gave graphic testimony under court-ordered anonymity Thursday. The ex-assistant alleged the musician sexually assaulted her and violently abused Combs’ ex-girlfriend, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura

Using the pseudonym “Mia,” she said fear and a possible nondisclosure agreement kept her silent.

Former federal prosecutor Maria Cruz Melendez, who helped convict rapper R. Kelly on RICO charges, joined NewsNation’s “Banfield” as the new testimony rocked Combs’ highly publicized trial. 

RICO, or the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, allows prosecutors to pursue criminal charges against multiple people or groups who commit related crimes over time for financial profit.

Mia was ‘inside of enterprise,’ can help pursue RICO charges: Former prosecutor

Regarding Combs’ case, Melendez said, “It’s tough to ask the question of whether or not the government has proven RICO, particularly so early on.” 

However, Mia was “inside of the enterprise,” which could help the prosecution pursue RICO charges. 

“In that situation, I think she provides powerful evidence that can be used by the government to show that an enterprise existed and that the enterprise was used to engage in the conduct that’s been alleged,” Melendez said. 

One of Combs’ charges is racketeering conspiracy. He has not been charged with a full RICO charge. 

“What the government needs to show is that Sean Combs agreed with at least one other person to engage in racketeering, so they don’t have to prove specific racketeering acts in the way that you would need to if you had charged substantive racketeering,” Melendez said. 

Diddy vs. R. Kelly cases: How similar are they? 

Melendez said the Combs and R. Kelly cases have parallels.

Both involve a high-profile defendant who allegedly committed abuse within their businesses and close circles. And both had legitimate businesses, or “enterprises,” used for alleged illegitimate purposes, which constitutes racketeering. 

  • FILE - R. Kelly leaves the Daley Center after a hearing in his child support case, May 8, 2019, in Chicago. (AP Photo/Matt Marton, File)
  • R Kelly
  • courtroom rendering of Diddy blowing a kiss

“Some of the testimony that happened this week demonstrates the ways in which he used individuals at his disposal in order to maintain control over individuals like Cassie Ventura,” Melendez said.

R. Kelly was convicted for 30 years on racketeering, sex trafficking and other charges. In February, that sentence was upheld by a federal appeals court. Kelly had claimed that federal prosecutors failed to prove he led a racketeering scheme.

“Enabled by a constellation of managers, assistants, and other staff for over twenty-five years,” Kelly used his fame to lure girls and young women into his grasp, Circuit Judge Denny Chin wrote.

Combs’ trial will enter its fourth week on Monday. He also faces sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution charges. 

Crime

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

AUTO TEST CUSTOM HTML 20260112181412